Abstract

In a world of conflicting information, the ability to distinguish between reliable and unreliable information sources is crucial. Through three studies, my PhD thesis investigates how individuals, even from a young age, decide from whom to learn based on their perceptions of potential informants.

Study 1 focuses on the impact of individuals’ traits, revealing that adults consider “naturally talented” individuals more competent than “hardworking” ones. Consequently, they prefer to learn from the naturally talented over hard workers.

Study 2 explores the impact of individuals’ behaviors, showing that children and adults evaluate lying behaviors based on honest intentions and adherence to cultural conventions. While truth-tellers are generally preferred, individuals are more accepting of lies consistent with cultural norms.

Study 3 investigates the impact of individuals’ behaviors in group settings, uncovering children and adults’ preferences for conformists over non-conformists. Their preferences for conformists are also shaped by the context in which conformity occurs.

Overall, these three studies highlight how individuals attentively observe the traits and behaviors of potential informants, ultimately shaping their perceptions and learning preferences.